Dr Brandon Yoder

Lecturer (Assistant Professor)
College Arts & Social Sciences

Areas of expertise

  • Political Science 1606
  • International Relations 160607
  • Comparative Government And Politics 160603
  • Government And Politics Of Asia And The Pacific 160606
  • Experimental Economics 140206

Research interests

International Security, US-China Relations, Chinese Politics, Politics of East Asia, Power Transitions, Signaling and Credibility, Formal Models, Lab Experiments, Foreign Policy, Comparative Democratization

Researcher's projects


Signaling Under the Security Dilemma: An Experimental Analysis (with Kyle Haynes). Under review at Journal of Conflict Resolution

Costly Talk: Covert Action, Transparency, and Credible Reassurance. Under review at World Politics

How Informative are China’s Foreign Policy Signals? IR Theory and the Debate about China’s Intentions. Under review at Chinese Journal of International Politics

Reciprocation or Resolve? The Tradeoffs of Conditional Foreign Policy Strategies (with Kyle Haynes). Under review at International Theory

Mutual Uncertainty and Credible Communication: Experimental Evidence (with Kyle Haynes). Under review at International Interactions



Mixed Signals: The Limits of Reassurance in International Relations

China’s Rise and the ‘Engagement-Containment’ Debate

Signaling and Socialization: Reassurance with Endogenous Preferences (with Kyle Haynes)

The Policy Relevance of Formal Models

How Third-Party Threats Facilitate Credible Reassurance

Multiple Audiences and Credible Cheap Talk Signals

Credible Reassurance and Preventive Conflict under Endogenous Power Shifts

Realism’s Goldilocks Problem: Explaining Balancing Patterns in China-Russia Relations (with Alexander Korolev)

Provocation versus Resolve in Coercive Bargaining (with Kyle Haynes)

Do States Balance Static or Dynamic Power?

Appeasement as a Balancing Strategy


Book Manuscript: Uncertainty and Decline: Power Shifts, Credible Signaling, and US-China Relations

How can the US and other states form accurate beliefs about the intentions of a rising China? Signaling during power shifts has also been dramatically undertheorized, and the literature on China’s rise lack systematic criteria for inferring China’s intentions. This project presents a novel theoretical framework that identifies conditions under which a rising state’s behavioral signals are more or less credible, and criteria that scholars and policymakers can use to infer a state’s foreign policy goals from its past actions. The findings al two chapters applied to contemporary US-China relations, to assess the credibility of China’s recent foreign policy signals and derive implications for US foreign policy.


Edited Volume: International Relations Theory and China-Russia Relations after the Cold War

It has been widely noted that China and Russia have grown progressively closer over the last two decades, yet the bilateral relationship has been the subject of very little scrutiny using rigorous theory. This volume addresses the theoretical lacuna in the literature on China-Russia relations by bringing together leading scholars of international relations from various theoretical perspectives, as well as theoretically-informed experts in Chinese and/or Russian foreign policy. The chapters work in combination to both improve our understanding of a crucially important contemporary case, while also advancing IR theory in substantial ways.


Conference: International relations Theory and China-India relations

Return to top

Updated:  14 August 2020 / Responsible Officer:  Director (Research Services Division) / Page Contact:  Researchers